AMD Ryzen 7 3700X review: the best 8-core gaming CPU. What gen is ryzen 7 3700x

A quick look at gaming performance from World War Z doesn’t see any major differences in performance on the two boards. Later, we’ll check what it looks like for the B350 and X370 motherboards as well.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X VS Ryzen 7 3700X: Which one is better

Three years have passed since the premiere of the AMD Ryzen processors on which they were based.

Three years have passed since the launch of the AMD Ryzen processors based on Zen architecture, and these processors have wreaked havoc on the market and surprised Intel. AMD was the first company in the market to introduce more than four cores in mainstream processors, and Intel had to do so for its mainstream processors as well. First-gen Ryzen processors weren’t very good in terms of single-core performance, but multi-core performance was better than Intel’s counterparts.

For 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen processors, single-core performance has been improved and the processor cores have been tuned. This architecture was called the Zen + architecture because there weren’t many architectural differences in the processors. The most powerful mainstream processor of the second generation was the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, and this processor provided similar single-core performance to standard Intel processors. Even so, multi-core performance was significantly higher due to the presence of eight cores and sixteen threads.

At the end of 2019, AMD released 3rd generation AMD Ryzen processors, which completely changed everything with even higher single-core performance, while providing many other advantages such as faster memory speeds, much larger cache sizes, etc. The most popular 3rd generation processors are AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / X and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. In this article, we will go over the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 2700X and see the factors to consider before purchasing any of these processors.


Specifications AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Architecture Zen+ Zen2
Cores 8 8
Threads 16 16
Base clock 3700 MHz 3600 MHz
The boost timer 4300 MHz 4400 MHz
L3 cache 16 MB 32MB
Process 12nm 7nm
Electric socket AM4 AM4
TDP 105W 65W
Release date March 2018 July 2019
Check the price Check the price

The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is one of the flagship processors in the mainstream series. Unlike the first-generation Ryzen processors, in the second-generation there were only two processors with eight cores; namely AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. First, the biggest difference between the Ryzen 7 2700X and the Ryzen 7 3700X is that the 2700X is based on the 12nm process while the 3700X is based on the TSMC 7nm process. This leads to significantly better performance on the Ryzen 7 3700X and has a much lower TDP of 65 watts than the high TDP of 105 watts. The results on overclocked processors, however, will be different and will likely be around twice the stated TDP, especially the 3700X consumes even more than twice, at around 150 watts. This still makes the 3700X cooler than the Ryzen 7 2700X, which sometimes exceeds 200 watts.

In which the unlocked processors differ from the locked processors identified by the suffix “K” or “X”. The big change to 3rd generation Ryzen processors is that the cache sizes of the processors are significantly modified and overall the size of the L1 cache is reduced and the size of the L3 cache is increased.

Outside of the memory channel, the default memory frequency of 2700X is 2933MHz and 3700X is 3200MHz. Both processors ship with the same cooling, ie the AMD Wraith Prism RGB Cooler, which is a pretty good cooling solution and is much better than the AMD Wraith Spire cooling. On the other hand, the weaker Ryzen 7 2700 (no X) does not feature AMD Wraith Prism cooling and uses Wraith Spire cooling.

These results are more impressive because Premiere is very pro-Intel software. AMD showed that the 3900X is just over 50% faster than the 9900K in DaVinci Resolve, and yes we know we need to tidy up the DaVinci project and start adding it to our testing, promise we’ll do it soon.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X specs

The Ryzen 7 3700X introduces the next-generation AMD processor architecture: Zen 2. This particular octa-core chip, using a new mixed-node chiplet design, features a single 7nm CCD, complete with two 100% efficient quad-core CCX cluster drivers. Co-inhabiting the AM4 socket space next to this single CCD is a solitary 14nm cIOD I / O matrix that houses all non-core and I / O functionality.

Maintaining a constant flow of data between each separate chiplet is the AMD Infinity Fabric interconnect.

This menagerie of silicon chiplets is happily running at a base clock of 3.6 GHz and will increase the frequency to 4.4 GHz if necessary. That’s just a tad higher than the Ryzen 7 2700X on a 3.7GHz base and 4.3GHz boost, which might raise some doubts about proficiency in this 7nm business. In a way, you would be right about the clock speed itself. This first generation of 7nm chips did not drastically increase the clock frequency of the 12nm part – those times are gone – but Zen 2 is more than just clock frequency.

Ryzen 9 3950X Ryzen 9 3900X Ryzen 7 3800X Ryzen 7 3700X Ryzen 5 3600X Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / threads 16/32 12/24 8/16 8/16 6/12 6/12
Turbo clock 4.7 GHz 4.6 GHz 4.5 GHz 4.4 GHz 4.4 GHz 4.2 GHz
Base clock 3.5 GHz 3.8 GHz 3.9 GHz 3.6 GHz 3.8 GHz 3.6 GHz
TDP 105W 105W 105W 65W 95W 65W
Total Cache 72MB 70MB 36MB 36MB 35 MB 35 MB
Price 749 $ 499 $ 399 pLN 329 249 $ 199

This chip moves along the fine line between fast performance and energy efficiency. In fact, it’s the only X-series chip above the Ryzen 5 3600 that can fit into a 65-watt TDP. This is all thanks to the 7nm process node, which allows for much higher performance compared to the 12nm or 14nm predecessors. The total platform power of this eight-core processor hit just 148 watts under load in x264 v5.0 – 37% less than required by the Ryzen 7 2700X.

Zen 2 architecture is more than a shrinkage process, it is a completely changed architecture. AMD increased the IPC by as much as 15% with Zen 2, achieved through various architectural changes. Notable changes include: front-end improvements, doubling floating point performance, and reducing effective memory latency.

One such improvement is the redesigned cache hierarchy. The CCX design is still well known on the surface, but the L3 cache has been doubled compared to the second-gen Ryzen units. This all adds up to 36MB of total cache on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

With almost complete parity with the Ryzen 7 3800X in almost every way, except for a marginal drop in clock speed, it would seem that the cheaper Ryzen 7 chip could become a threat to its bigger sibling in the hands of anyone with the slightest idea of ​​how to overclock.

AMD Ryzen 3700X benchmarks

PCGN test stand: MSI MEG ACE X570 / MSI Gaming M7 AC X470 / MSI MPG Gaming Edge AC Z390, 16 GB Trident Z Royal / Corsair Dominator @ 3200 MHz, Samsung 970 Evo 2 TB, Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti, Corsair HX1200i, Corsair H100i V2, Philips BDM3275

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X performance

The R9 3900X matched the performance of a single 9900K core and was 19% faster than the 2700X. The 3700X also performed well, scoring 500 points, which placed it roughly on par with the 9700K, so that’s a huge performance improvement for Ryzen.

Entering the Ryzen Ecosystem

As a result, if you’ve been waiting for a bit more performance with a Ryzen 7 chip before pulling the trigger on one, the Ryzen 7 3700X is the chip to buy. However, this is not for people upgrading from previous Ryzen 7 chips as the differences between the generations are modest. It’s likely that most of the people looking at this chip will therefore be new to the Ryzen ecosystem, so here’s what to expect.

First and foremost, the Ryzen 7 3700X will work with many newer AM4 motherboard models. You only need to buy a state-of-the-art X570 board if you are committed to the future benefits of PCIe 4.0. (Check out our guide to all the X570 motherboards we saw at Computex 2019.) Otherwise, many of the dozens of AM4-compatible X470 and X370 motherboards will work, as well as some other AMD chipsets under AM4. (Check out this article from ExtremeTech’s sister site to find out how the complexity of older AMD AM4 chipsets and motherboards will be compatible with Ryzen 3000 series CPUs; if you have a supported motherboard it will almost certainly be for a BIOS update.) No Motherboard AMD does, however, support the Thunderbolt 3 interface,so if you need that connectivity with peripherals, I’ll have to either stick with an Intel CPU or explore additional cards.

Second, you don’t necessarily need to purchase a separate CPU cooler as the Ryzen 7 3700X comes with its own Wraith Prism cooling fan along with RGB lighting. We used this factory cooler in our test bench and found it to be in perfect working order. Plus it looks great. If you need a lot of overclocking space you may want a fancier liquid cooler, but computer builders on a budget won’t need it and can enjoy some savings here.

Speaking of overclocking, all Ryzen chips are unlocked and ready to be overclocked. Moreover, AMD has taken a lot of the guesswork out of overclocking with Precision Boost Overdrive, which automatically increases temperature, CPU power consumption, and VRM (motherboard’s ability to power the CPU) to determine how high the core frequency can rise before reaching a certain limit. You can activate the PBO in the Ryzen Master settings app without having to go into the BIOS. Of course, remember that overclocking, even with PBO, will void the Ryzen 7 3700X’s three-year warranty.

If you don’t overclock, you’ll be running somewhere between a base clock frequency of 3.6 GHz and a boost clock of 4.4 GHz. Although its base clock frequency is the same, the Intel Core i7-9700K has a slightly higher maximum boost speed of 4.9 GHz. Clock speed doesn’t increase between CPU generations as much as it did about a decade ago, but the difference between the speeds of the Ryzen 7 3700X and the Ryzen 7 1700X First Generation (released in 2017) is impressive nevertheless. The Ryzen 7 1700X octa-core 16-thread chip also has a base clock of 3.4 GHz and a boost of just 3.8 GHz.

Many serious content creators will also want a graphics card for GPU-accelerated applications. In these target markets

Performance Testing

Our test bench setup for the Ryzen 7 3700X is based on the MSI MEG X570 Godlike X570 motherboard, which has its own fan built into it above the chipset for additional cooling. Chipset-specific fans are relatively rare even on high-end gaming motherboards, but we’ve seen a common feature of X570 motherboards.

Also in our configuration: 16GB of G.Skill DDR4-3600 memory, Corsair MP600 PCI Gen 4 SSD boot drive, and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition graphics card to support video output. We used memory at a maximum speed of 3600 MHz in all tests. Part of the innovation around the X570 is its support for higher memory speeds, assuming you have compatible memory; in this case, the MSI board released the XMP profile for RAM at this speed, no fuss; all we had to do was click.

We test processors with various synthetic benchmarks that offer proprietary results as well as real-world tests using consumer apps like Apple’s iTunes and 3D games like Far Cry 5.

Cinebench R15

One of the best CPU performance indicators is the Cinebench R15 benchmark, which offers a good overview of performance in many different types of demanding applications. It is a CPU-centric test that measures both single and multi-core CPU performance. The resulting results are proprietary numbers that represent the capabilities of the processor when rendering a complex 3D image.

Note how the single core performance and all Ryzen 7 3700X cores are slightly better compared to the Ryzen 7 2700X. For the All Cores test, both chips outperform the Core i7-8700K, which is not surprising as this chip is limited to 12 threads instead of 16. But the key difference is that with a single-core Cinebench score of 200 the Ryzen 7 3700X is roughly at equal to the Core i7-8700K, while its predecessor was slightly slower, with a score of 172.

We haven’t tested the Core i7-9700K yet, hence its lack in the rankings, but we expect its performance to be slightly better than the Core i7-8700K, which it replaces in single-core scenarios, but lags behind in multi-core scenarios due to lack of thread doubling support.


The POV-Ray benchmark is a synthetic, multi-threaded rendering test that offers a second opinion on Cinebench results. In this test, as could be predicted, the Ryzen 7 3700X achieved better all-core performance than the Core i7-8700K and was not too far behind in the single-core test.

While many modern complex applications are designed to run on multiple cores, single-core performance is still important. Many older games, especially those built on DirectX 9, only use one or two cores. The manufacturing differences mean that there are slight variations in the maximum performance of each core, so the better performance of each core “raises all sails,” as an AMD spokesman put it.


To get a real look at single-core performance, we’re using Apple’s older version of iTunes to encode a series of music tracks. It’s definitely older software – Apple has already announced the iTunes expiration – and it’s single-threaded, which means having more threads doesn’t help you get to the Ryzen 7 3700X faster.

As with Cinebench, the results show that the Ryzen 7 3700X has better single-core performance than its predecessor, though not as good here as the Core i7-8700K.

The Ryzen 7 3700x has an edge when it comes to threads, and the i7 9700k has an edge over boost overclocking. However, the performance gains with the i7 are not worth the price, which is why customers typically prefer the Ryzen 7 3700. Intel’s Core i7 9700k costs around $ 410 on Amazon, while the Ryzen 3700x costs around $ 330$.

The AMD 3rd Gen Ryzen Deep Dive Review: 3700X and 3900X Raising The Bar

This is the review we’ve all been waiting for. Since last December – and especially from CES – AMD has been teasing us about the new Zen 2 microarchitecture and the newest series of AMD Ryzen 3000 processors. Thanks to the greatly improved processor architecture and built using the latest generation TSMC manufacturing process, AMD continues to run at full speed over time, when rival Intel had problems with mobility at all. The end result is that while the first and second generation Ryzen processors were all about getting AMD back into competition and taking Intel’s significant performance advantage, the Ryzen 3000 series is nothing short of AMD’s first shot in almost 13 years meeting (or beating) Intel in the its own game in the desktop processor market. This is a big moment for AMD and exciting in the entire processor industry.

The new Ryzen 3000 chips are the first “big” leap for AMD since the introduction of its first Ryzen processors just over two years ago. Unlike last year’s Ryzen 2000 series, which was a minor refresh and made some tweaks to the microarchitecture and process node, this year’s Ryzen 3000 is a major upgrade to both the CPU and Production Node architecture. This marks AMD’s move from the 12nm GlobalFoundries process to the newest 7nm TSMC node. But more exciting is how AMD was able to implement this switch: The Ryzen 3000 is not just a single chip, but a collection of heterogeneous chiplets, introducing this design paradigm for the first time in a consumer product.

Today, AMD is launching a whole new line of processors and platform, alongside the new Navi-based Radeon RX 5700 series. In terms of CPU coverage, we’ll take a closer look at the new flagship, the 12-core Ryzen 3900X for $ 499, as well as the 8-core Ryzen 7 3700X for $ 329 and its ultra-low TDP of 65W.


  • (7/8): We noticed a big change in the frequency of ramping up behavior after the new motherboard firmware was released on the day of launch (7/7). We are currently re-running all our test kit numbers and updating the article with new data as soon as possible. More information can be found here.
  • (7/9): We updated the article benchmark results to 3900X. We saw a 3-9% improvement in exclusive ST loads. MT loads remained unchanged, Gaming had both advantages and disadvantages. We are still working on updating the 3700X numbers. The original BIOS results are marked with the symbol on the graphs.
  • (7/10): We also updated the 3700X results. Ultimately, our conclusions remained the same, but AMD narrows the gap even further. For a full summary of our findings, please see this article.

The CPU Line-up

AMD “Matisse” Ryzen 3000 series processors
AnandTech Cores
I / O + processor
TDP Price
Ryzen 9 3950X 16C 32T 3.5 4.7 8 MB 64 MB 16 + 4 + 4 1 + 2 105W 749
Ryzen 9 3900X 12C 24T 3.8 4.6 6 MB 64 MB 16 + 4 + 4 1 + 2 105W $ 499
Ryzen 7 3800X 8C 16T 3.9 4.5 4 MB 32 MB 16 + 4 + 4 1 + 1 105W $ 399
Ryzen 7 3700X 8C 16T 3.6 4.4 4 MB 32 MB 16 + 4 + 4 1 + 1 65W pLN 329
Ryzen 5 3600X 6C 12T 3.8 4.4 3 MB 32 MB 16 + 4 + 4 1 + 1 95W 249
Ryzen 5 3600 6C 12T 3.6 4.2 3 MB 32 MB 16 + 4 + 4 1 + 1 65W $ 199

The Ryzen 3000 Competition: Intel’s Coffee Lake Refresh

Positioning the Ryzen 3000 series against Intel’s offering is a question of both performance and price. AMD has already done comparisons between the new SKUs and Intel’s counterparts on Computex, where we’ve seen comparisons between units of similar price. Even Intel’s expensive, high-end desktop (HEDT) processor (HEDT), the Core i9-9920X, isn’t entirely out of the Ryzen 3900X’s line of fire, according to the company.

In short, compared to its immediate predecessor, Intel’s Coffee Lake Refresh has received a significant increase in both clock speed and number of cores. This allowed Intel to wipe out all the leading positions in the Ryzen 2000 series in multi-threaded performance while maintaining a convenient single-threaded performance advantage.

Compared to the Ryzen 3000 series, Intel’s line will no longer have a leading position in the IPC. AMD has not been in this position since Athlon’s 64 days, more than 15 years ago, which is a remarkable turn of events. But with that said, make no mistake: IPC is only half the single-threaded performance equation and the other is the raw frequency, and Intel’s line still has a noticeable advantage with peak frequencies up to 5 GHz. So Intel’s acquisition of a single-threaded performance advantage (at least permanently) is a difficult task for the Ryzen 3000 series.

Comparison: Ryzen 9 3900X vs Core i9-9900K
Ryzen 9 3900X
Characteristics Intel
Core i9-9900K
12/24 Cores / threads 8/16
3.8 / 4.6 GHz Base / Turbo 3.6 / 5.0 GHz
16 (Free) + 4 (NVMe) PCIe 4.0 lines 16 (Free) Gen 3.0
(Not Gen 4.0)
512 KB / core L2 cache 256 KB / core
4x 16 MB
a total of 64 MB
L3 cache 16 MB
105 W TDP 95 W
$ 499
(cooler included)
Price list) $ 484
(without cooler)

Looking at chip pricing and positioning, the big battle of flagships among desktop processors will be between the Ryzen 3900X for $ 499 and the i9-9900K for $ 484. Both are the top-notch SKUs of the respective desktop platforms. Keep in mind that AMD processors ship with good cooling while Intel options do not, meaning you would have to spend more to run an Intel system.

Here AMD should have a significant advantage in terms of the multi-threaded performance of the new Ryzen 9 series, as it is able to use 50% more cores than Intel, while promising to maintain a similar TDP 105W vs 95W range. We still expect the 9900K to get some jobs which are lighter threaded, simply due to Intel’s predominance of clock speed, however, this is something we’ll explore in more detail in an upcoming comparative analysis.

Comparison: Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-9700K
Ryzen 7 3700X
Characteristics Intel
Core i7-9700K
8/16 Cores / threads 8/8
3.6 / 4.4 GHz Base / Turbo 3.6 / 4.9 GHz
16 (Free) + 4 (NVMe) PCIe 4.0 lines 16 (Free) Gen 3.0
(Not Gen 4.0)
512 KB / core L2 cache 256 KB / core
2x 16 MB
32 MB in total
L3 cache 12 MB
65 W TDP 95 W
pLN 329
(cooler included)
Price list) 385
(Without cooler)

The Ryzen 7 3700X completely destroys its predecessor in terms of performance per watt. With a generous 7nm performance boost, the newest chip’s 65W TDP makes it a chip that not only outperforms the best second-generation Ryzen chips, but does it effortlessly with a total platform power of 148W in x264 v5.0 for Ryzen 7 2700X 235W.

DDR4-3200 vs. DDR4-3600

DDR4-3600 is the fastest memory specification recommended by AMD with 3rd Gen Ryzen as the higher clock speed will actually reduce performance, at least when clocking higher than 3733, as this changes the Infinity Fabric to 2: 1 instead of 1: 1. Basically 2: 1 makes Infinity Fabric clocked at a quarter of the memory speed, while 1: 1 is half.

Since AMD recommends DDR4-3600 for optimal performance and provided us with the CL16 kit, we only tested it to make sure we were not limiting performance by using the CL14 3200 kit.

The good news is we’re not, here you’ll see virtually identical performance on Corona, WinRAR, Far Cry New Dawn, Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, and World War Z from every RAM set.

Due to time constraints, we did not go any further in memory testing. We’ll cover this later, but for now, we see that choosing RAM or not maximizing Ryzen’s capabilities in this regard doesn’t significantly alter the KPIs.

X570 vs. B450 Chipset

We also took a look at the performance of the chipset comparing the B450 to the X570, using the MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC and the MSI X570 Creation. We didn’t include any testing of the X470 due to time constraints, but considering that the B450 and X470 boards deliver the same performance, it’s pretty easy to fill the gaps.

When looking at the Cinebench results there seems to be a marginal difference between the two platforms, but we are talking about a 1% difference in margin or error boundaries.

By enabling the PBO + AutoOC feature in the Ryzen Master, we again see similar performance on the X570 and B450 motherboards. As AMD claims, the PBO feature in 3rd Gen Ryzen processors can be enabled on all motherboards that support these new processors.

A quick look at gaming performance from World War Z doesn’t see any major differences in performance on the two boards. Later, we’ll check what it looks like for the B350 and X370 motherboards as well.

It is a bit cheaper than the Intel Core i7 9700K, the de facto high-end gaming chip from Intel at the moment. This also applies to the Wraith Prism cooler. These are pretty good achievements.

How To Select Motherboard For Ryzen 7 3700x

The motherboard is the backbone of a computer system. It is one of the most important PC components that many manufacturers take short cuts of and blindly trust the “gaming features” listed on the manufacturer’s packaging. Manufacturers don’t really give out the details necessary to clear our minds before we make a final decision, except for the chipset, RGB, Wi-Fi and overclocking capabilities. Making the wrong choice, such as pairing a high-end Ryzen 9 processor with an A320 motherboard, can be disastrous. So let’s look at some important factors that enable you to make an informed decision about your future construction.

VRM Design

Voltage regulator modules (VRMs) are responsible for providing power to the processor. It lowers the voltage coming from the power supply to keep the CPU under safe conditions. It’s extremely important to focus on VRM when purchasing a motherboard. The quality and design of the VRM can greatly affect the performance of the processor. Good quality VRMs are durable, stably hold higher power, and overclock. On the other hand, low quality VRMs are unstable, cannot maintain high power delivery, and can be life threatening for the CPU.

Moreover, high-end motherboards feature heatsinks that dissipate heat from the VRM for added durability and stability. One of the easiest ways to tell good motherboards from average is to look at the number of VRMs and power phases. Unfortunately, many people are unaware of what VRMs are and how they work, which often leads to bad decisions in the purchasing or purchasing process.


The best motherboards for the Ryzen 7 3700X

Photo of Ryzen 7 3700x motherboards.

Many people want to future-proof their designs, reducing the need to change components every time they update to something better and newer. Fortunately, upgrading to an AMD motherboard is easy as one chipset is compatible with multiple generations of AMD processors. If you’re on a tight budget and want to upgrade to newer hardware like the Ryzen 2000 to 5000 upgrade then yes, you should look for compatible motherboards. Motherboards such as the B550, A520 and X570 officially support the Zen 2 and Zen 3 lineups.

The best motherboards for the Ryzen 7 3700x at a glance:

  • ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
  • Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
  • MSI MAG X570 Tomahawk WiFi
  • ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming
  • MSI MAG B550M mortar

5 Best Motherboards For Ryzen 7 3700X In 2022

# Announcement Model Award Details
1 ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero The best general motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X 1,126 reviews
Check the price
2 Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master The best overclocking motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X 1,250 reviews
Check the price
3 MSI MAG X570 Tomahawk WiFi The best motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X 429 Reviews
Check the price
4 ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX / TB3 The best Mini-ITX motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X 189 reviews
Check the price
5 MSI MAG B550M mortar The best affordable motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X 365 reviews
Check the price
# 1
Model ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Award The best general motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X
Details 1,126 reviews
Check the price
# 2
Model Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Award The best overclocking motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X
Details 1,250 reviews
Check the price
# 3
Model MSI MAG X570 Tomahawk WiFi
Award The best motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X
Details 429 Reviews
Check the price
# 4
Model ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX / TB3
Award The best Mini-ITX motherboard for the Ryzen 7 3700X
Details 189 reviews
Check the price

Today, AMD is launching a whole new line of processors and platform, alongside the new Navi-based Radeon RX 5700 series. In terms of CPU coverage, we’ll take a closer look at the new flagship, the 12-core Ryzen 3900X for $ 499, as well as the 8-core Ryzen 7 3700X for $ 329 and its ultra-low TDP of 65W.

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen 5 5600X: Gaming Performance Compared

Late last year, AMD launched its Ryzen 5000 processors, ripping off the crown in games from Intel after three (2 and a half) generations of Zen. With a 19% increase in IPCs, higher boost clocks, and wider core complexes, we expect generational gains to be in the range of 20 to 35%, especially for gaming-related workloads. You can read our detailed information on the architecture of Ryzen 5000 processors and Zen 3 core here. We compared the latency / bandwidth between the cores and the Matisse and Vermeer cache and got some very interesting results.

In this post, we are going to compare the $ 299 (currently $ 279) Ryzen 5 5600X to a similarly priced Ryzen 7 3700X that includes two additional cores, and decide if it’s better to go for a larger number of cores or a higher IPC / gamble boost clock combination.

Test Bench

  • Motherboard: ASRock X570 Taichi
  • Memory: Trident Royal Z 8GB x2 @ 3733MT / s (CL16)
  • Radiator: NZXT Kraken X73: 360mm (special thanks to NZXT for providing an AIO cooler)
  • GPU: NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti
  • Power supply: Corsair HX1000i

We tested all games at 1080p ultra and then 720p medium to avoid GPU bottlenecks that could otherwise affect the results. In Ashes of the Singularity in 1080, both CPUs generated nearly identical averages and slightly different lows. This is despite the fact that it is certainly one of the most CPU-intensive games on the market.

Amazingly, the Ryzen 5 5600X outperformed the 3700X as well as the 5900X in relation to the averages at 720p. When it comes to lows, the 5600X six-core core was once again faster than the older eight-core Ryzen.

As you can see, the Ryzen 5 5600X achieves an average CPU load of 88% and a peak of 100%. Average thread utilization is also quite high at 97% with a minimum of 75%. On the other hand, the Ryzen 7 3700X averaged a little bit lower at 84%, with a minimum of 60% and a maximum of 100%. The clock speeds for the latter are slightly lower here (by 500 MHz), while the GPU utilization is more or less the same. This indicates that the difference in this case is primarily due to the IPC / single-threaded performance deficit between the two, despite the fact that Ashes handles the most multi-threaded titles with ease.

Assassins’ Creed Origins

Assassins’ Creed Origins gives very predictable results. Going from the six-core 3600X to the eight-core 3700X gives you less than a few frames. In a similar fashion, the transition from 5600X to 5900X pushes you by just over 5 FPS at 720p. By comparison, overall CPU utilization for the Ryzen 5 5600X averaged close to 70%, while the 3700X averaged just over 55%.

Assassins’ Creed Valhalla

Rate article