A quick look at gaming performance from World War Z doesn’t see any major differences in performance on the two boards. Later, we’ll check what it looks like for the B350 and X370 motherboards as well.
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X VS Ryzen 7 3700X: Which one is better
Three years have passed since the premiere of the AMD Ryzen processors on which they were based.
Three years have passed since the launch of the AMD Ryzen processors based on Zen architecture, and these processors have wreaked havoc on the market and surprised Intel. AMD was the first company in the market to introduce more than four cores in mainstream processors, and Intel had to do so for its mainstream processors as well. First-gen Ryzen processors weren’t very good in terms of single-core performance, but multi-core performance was better than Intel’s counterparts.
For 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen processors, single-core performance has been improved and the processor cores have been tuned. This architecture was called the Zen + architecture because there weren’t many architectural differences in the processors. The most powerful mainstream processor of the second generation was the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, and this processor provided similar single-core performance to standard Intel processors. Even so, multi-core performance was significantly higher due to the presence of eight cores and sixteen threads.
At the end of 2019, AMD released 3rd generation AMD Ryzen processors, which completely changed everything with even higher single-core performance, while providing many other advantages such as faster memory speeds, much larger cache sizes, etc. The most popular 3rd generation processors are AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / X and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. In this article, we will go over the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 2700X and see the factors to consider before purchasing any of these processors.
|Specifications||AMD Ryzen 7 2700X||AMD Ryzen 7 3700X|
|Base clock||3700 MHz||3600 MHz|
|The boost timer||4300 MHz||4400 MHz|
|L3 cache||16 MB||32MB|
|Release date||March 2018||July 2019|
|Check the price||Check the price|
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700X is one of the flagship processors in the mainstream series. Unlike the first-generation Ryzen processors, in the second-generation there were only two processors with eight cores; namely AMD Ryzen 7 2700 and AMD Ryzen 7 2700X. First, the biggest difference between the Ryzen 7 2700X and the Ryzen 7 3700X is that the 2700X is based on the 12nm process while the 3700X is based on the TSMC 7nm process. This leads to significantly better performance on the Ryzen 7 3700X and has a much lower TDP of 65 watts than the high TDP of 105 watts. The results on overclocked processors, however, will be different and will likely be around twice the stated TDP, especially the 3700X consumes even more than twice, at around 150 watts. This still makes the 3700X cooler than the Ryzen 7 2700X, which sometimes exceeds 200 watts.
In which the unlocked processors differ from the locked processors identified by the suffix “K” or “X”. The big change to 3rd generation Ryzen processors is that the cache sizes of the processors are significantly modified and overall the size of the L1 cache is reduced and the size of the L3 cache is increased.
Outside of the memory channel, the default memory frequency of 2700X is 2933MHz and 3700X is 3200MHz. Both processors ship with the same cooling, ie the AMD Wraith Prism RGB Cooler, which is a pretty good cooling solution and is much better than the AMD Wraith Spire cooling. On the other hand, the weaker Ryzen 7 2700 (no X) does not feature AMD Wraith Prism cooling and uses Wraith Spire cooling.
These results are more impressive because Premiere is very pro-Intel software. AMD showed that the 3900X is just over 50% faster than the 9900K in DaVinci Resolve, and yes we know we need to tidy up the DaVinci project and start adding it to our testing, promise we’ll do it soon.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X specs
The Ryzen 7 3700X introduces the next-generation AMD processor architecture: Zen 2. This particular octa-core chip, using a new mixed-node chiplet design, features a single 7nm CCD, complete with two 100% efficient quad-core CCX cluster drivers. Co-inhabiting the AM4 socket space next to this single CCD is a solitary 14nm cIOD I / O matrix that houses all non-core and I / O functionality.
Maintaining a constant flow of data between each separate chiplet is the AMD Infinity Fabric interconnect.
This menagerie of silicon chiplets is happily running at a base clock of 3.6 GHz and will increase the frequency to 4.4 GHz if necessary. That’s just a tad higher than the Ryzen 7 2700X on a 3.7GHz base and 4.3GHz boost, which might raise some doubts about proficiency in this 7nm business. In a way, you would be right about the clock speed itself. This first generation of 7nm chips did not drastically increase the clock frequency of the 12nm part – those times are gone – but Zen 2 is more than just clock frequency.
|Ryzen 9 3950X||Ryzen 9 3900X||Ryzen 7 3800X||Ryzen 7 3700X||Ryzen 5 3600X||Ryzen 5 3600|
|Cores / threads||16/32||12/24||8/16||8/16||6/12||6/12|
|Turbo clock||4.7 GHz||4.6 GHz||4.5 GHz||4.4 GHz||4.4 GHz||4.2 GHz|
|Base clock||3.5 GHz||3.8 GHz||3.9 GHz||3.6 GHz||3.8 GHz||3.6 GHz|
|Total Cache||72MB||70MB||36MB||36MB||35 MB||35 MB|
|Price||749||$ 499||$ 399||pLN 329||249||$ 199|
This chip moves along the fine line between fast performance and energy efficiency. In fact, it’s the only X-series chip above the Ryzen 5 3600 that can fit into a 65-watt TDP. This is all thanks to the 7nm process node, which allows for much higher performance compared to the 12nm or 14nm predecessors. The total platform power of this eight-core processor hit just 148 watts under load in x264 v5.0 – 37% less than required by the Ryzen 7 2700X.
Zen 2 architecture is more than a shrinkage process, it is a completely changed architecture. AMD increased the IPC by as much as 15% with Zen 2, achieved through various architectural changes. Notable changes include: front-end improvements, doubling floating point performance, and reducing effective memory latency.
One such improvement is the redesigned cache hierarchy. The CCX design is still well known on the surface, but the L3 cache has been doubled compared to the second-gen Ryzen units. This all adds up to 36MB of total cache on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
With almost complete parity with the Ryzen 7 3800X in almost every way, except for a marginal drop in clock speed, it would seem that the cheaper Ryzen 7 chip could become a threat to its bigger sibling in the hands of anyone with the slightest idea of how to overclock.