AMD vs. Intel: Which wins in 2022. Which is better amd or intel

Needless to say, these were very real options when they first appeared. However, years have passed and AMD has nothing new to offer. Technology stagnated and quickly fell behind Intel, whose processors improved from year to year.

Which is Better: Intel or AMD? 2022

the world of computer technology has been essentially marked by two-brand wars over the decades. Intel and AMD, the two biggest computer brands that have basically sparked so much debate among PC users. Be it for home use, gaming, workstation, high-performance enthusiast. The two-brand war continues.

Given the fact that the recent conflict between Coffee Lake and AMD Ryzen has started to expire to make way for the next generation of processors. Many users are starting to wonder which processor manufacturer can actually perform best in the current generation, while wondering if we will see the same results in the next generation.

That’s a bit weird, especially considering AMD and Intel focus quite differently on their approach to processors. AMD focuses on the number of cores and the multithreading capability that their CPUs can take up, while Intel strongly promotes the use of overclocking and higher speeds with fewer cores.

The user will still be looking for the perfect processor. What’s better for the casual user in 2018? Who is the titan who climbed the career ladder and became the undisputed champion in the CPU war? Many people have wondered about this question for years and Appuals aims to provide an answer.

Gaming Performance: Which CPU can Bring the Best Gaming Experience?

Games are one area where choosing a processor can be difficult. In fact, many users will have many aspects to consider when choosing the right processor for the job, let’s start with the Intel brand. All Intel processors include integrated graphics, but performance is not on par with standalone graphics chips or add-in graphics cards.

It’s really one of the worst CPUs to work with, especially when you’re betting on graphics resource intensive games like Final Fantasy XV, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Dragon Ball FighterZ, and other games of the same caliber. Getting straight to the point, they weren’t able to do much in terms of integrated graphics, with many games barely hitting 30fps at standard resolutions.

Meanwhile, AMD desktop processors do not include integrated graphics. Instead, AMD combines its processor cores and Radeon graphics cores into a single package / chip called APU. While these tend to offer better performance than Intel’s embedded graphics solutions, they still don’t hold the candle to the additional graphics solutions that are just a little more expensive.

Those looking to build a gaming PC will always know that AMD is the company most people are looking for. Thanks to VEGA technology, which AMD loves to brag about in terms of graphics performance, games like Battlefield V can run at 30 frames per second on RYZEN processors. It’s unbelievable to say the least.

overwatch benchmarks

Integrated graphics performance test

All in all, gamers who want to take their games seriously often turn to Intel as the integrated graphics that their processors can offer will certainly not make much of a difference. It’s worth mentioning that the games themselves may have several points to consider when it comes to the capabilities offered by Intel and AMD.

It all boils down to asking if you need to acquire a processor with Hyper-Threading. The answer is definitely “no” as most gaming tasks do not get any benefit from using Hyper Threading. In fact, and very unfortunately, Hyper Threading is hardly necessary to run the games themselves at a high enough speed.

The reason for this is that tasks like video games are performed serially. In other words, most of the operations are done in an orderly fashion in which one operation must take place before another operation begins. This basically makes Hyper Threading a rather luxurious plus for gamers, and really nothing else.

ashes of singularity patterns

Intel and AMD tests

Compare that to AMD processors, which are only good at focusing on multi-threaded operations. The problem is starting to form and many gaming users are sure to notice cracks at the seams in terms of gaming performance. Games, while much more multi-threaded today than they were in the past, still rarely use more than two to four threads, which usually gives Intel an edge, even with RYZEN’s amazing array of optimizations.

Chillblast can even do it for you. Our expert in-house system builders have decades of experience extracting the highest possible performance from high-end PC hardware and can do it for you absolutely free as part of your PC build contract. It also does not void the five-year warranty.

Desktop processors

In the past, AMD processors were the best option only in the budget and entry-level segments of the market, but that has changed for the AMD Ryzen 3000 and AMD Ryzen 5000. While AMD still represents great value for money, it now does so throughout the price and performance spectrum competing with Intel in everything and taking a decisive advantage in a few details, even at the highest level.

The most affordable AMD or Intel chips will cost anywhere from $ 40- $ 60 for a few cores and energy-saving clock speeds. The best mid-range processors cost anywhere from $ 200 to $ 350, while a top gaming processor costs around $ 500. If you want to speed up intensive tasks like video editing and transcoding, you can spend 400,000 North.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900x between the fingers.

Dan Baker / digital trends

Intel and AMD have excellent processors for gaming and performance tasks like video editing and transcoding, but they also have their specialties. The current top AMD, the Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X, beat everything Intel has to offer with 12 and 16 cores respectively.

Currently, the best Intel processor is the Core i9-10900K. Intel has already released the 11th generation desktop platform in which 11900K is to replace the 10900K. However, the last-generation chip offers much better value for money. The 10900K works more or less the same as the 11900K and the price goes down. The 11900K also has some temperature issues, making the 10900K the obvious choice for the blue team.

However, you don’t need to purchase the best one to get a great processor for gaming or work. At around $ 300, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, with six cores and high clock speed, is a fantastic AMD chip for work and play. Intel has 11600K in this price range, equivalent to 5600X with six cores and 12 threads. However, the 11600K has high power and heat requirements. On paper, the 11600K already has twice the power consumption of the 5600X, and in practice it can draw even more.

In the more entry-level market segments, the AMD processor tends to be better value for money, with standout models like the 3300X and 3600 offering amazing multitasking and gaming performance. We don’t have the budget Ryzen 5000 options yet, although we should do so in 2021. The Intel 10300F, however, is a credible competition.

Low-cost options like the AMD 3200G and Intel Core i3 10100 allow the system to boot without an additional graphics card, making them great for general office work and watching Netflix, though not too much. If you want to dip your fingers into light gaming, AMD offers the Ryzen 5000 APU with Radeon graphics.

Non-performance factors can make you choose one manufacturer over the other. Intel’s latest generation CPU has much better support for Thunderbolt 3 ports, if that’s something you can take advantage of. On the other hand, AMD offers overclocking on its cheaper B-series chipset, which allows budget builders to get the most performance out of their machine.

AMD is the better option for desktops these days, but that could change soon. Intel is expected to launch its Alder Lake hybrid processors in late 2021. This new architecture combines two types of cores to increase the number of cores, and rumors suggest they can run much faster than Intel’s current offering.

High-end desktop

Threadripper in the motherboard.

Laptop processors

The Acer Swift 3 16 laptop sits on a desk with the back tilted to the right.

The laptop market is a completely different story. Most of the notebooks you’ll find are based on different generations of Intel processors and integrated graphics. As a Dell representative once pointed out, Intel’s portfolio is simply huge compared to AMD’s, and its current range of laptops and their processors are better than ever.

Where the development of Intel desktop processors has slowed down in recent years, its mobile upgrades are much more exciting. Ice Lake processors introduced a more efficient design with much more efficient 11th generation graphics, offering enough performance to play a lot of esports games at around 60 frames per second (fps) without the need for a graphics card. Tiger Lake 11th generation mobile processors only further, such as the one found in the Acer Swift 5.

For even greater overall computing power, Intel offers Tiger Lake H processors. These high-performance chips use the Tiger Lake design, but push the limits of power further, offering faster clock speeds and more cores. Tiger Lake H chips can be found on high-end gaming laptops such as the Razer Blade 15. In mid-2021, there will also be many machines equipped with a 10th Gen Intel processor based on the Comet Lake project. These machines often come at a discount compared to their Tiger Lake H counterparts.

The wide range of options and production support means that most laptops still offer Intel processors as standard, but like desktops, AMD is also making strides in the field of mobile devices.

The Acer Swift 3 and the 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 were among the first examples of AMD’s recent mobile advances, and while they weren’t outstanding, they proved to be promising. That emphasis continued into 2020, with more powerful releases like the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 serving as a launch pad for new AMD Ryzen 4000 laptop chipsets. Lenovo refreshed its Legion gaming laptops in July 2020 with Ryzen 4000 mobile processors, pairing them with RTX 20 series graphics. Now there are dozens of options worth considering.

AMD announced its Ryzen 5000 processors for mobile devices at CES 2021, bringing the new Zen 3 architecture to thin and light laptops. These processors can be found in trimming machines such as the HP Pavilion Aero 13 and the HP Envy x360 15.

Anandtech noted that the 35-watt Ryzen 5980HS achieved performance levels of the Ryzen 5 5600X desktop in rendering tests, far surpassing the Ryzen 4000 and everything Intel has to offer today. Like the desktop Ryzen 5000, the new mobile line seems to be at the top of the charts.

Other benchmarks show similarly impressive performance. The octa-core Ryzen 9 5900HS beats the Intel i9-10980HK, which is one of the most powerful mobile processors available today. AMD chips are competitive with Intel in laptops. That said, you’re still more likely to find an Intel CPU, making this market easy to win for Team Blue.

Both AMD and Intel offer reliable performance for work and play, and there’s a lot more to consider than the CPU when purchasing a laptop, so browsing through individual model reviews is a must. This is especially true in 2021 as the Ryzen 5000 mobile platform is challenging Intel’s longtime mobile throne.

That’s a bit weird, especially considering AMD and Intel focus quite differently on their approach to processors. AMD focuses on the number of cores and the multithreading capability that their CPUs can take up, while Intel strongly promotes the use of overclocking and higher speeds with fewer cores.

Enter AMD Ryzen


The third generation of Ryzen processors is based on the Zen 2 architecture. It is manufactured using a 7nm process and consists of many versatile solutions in all price ranges.

Broadly speaking, Ryzen processors can be divided into five groups:

  • Ryzen 3 – designed for entry-level computers, offering good computing power at extremely low prices.
  • Ryzen 5 – Mid-range processors that offer great value for money and are great types for many gaming setups.
  • Ryzen 7 – performance-oriented solutions that will be found at home in most high-end gaming computers.
  • Ryzen 9 – Enthusiast-level performance at premium prices, but usually overkill in games.
  • Threadripper – top-class processors with a monstrous number of cores that offer unmatched performance, intended mainly for high-end workstations.

Since 2017, AMD has managed to give Intel a chance to earn money, offering more and more powerful solutions at very good prices every year. As a result, many players left the Intel camp and moved to AMD.

More specifically, though, you’re probably asking yourself, how does the latest 3rd Gen Ryzen Processors compare to 9th Gen Intel processors?

AMD Ryzen vs Intel Core

Clock speeds

In the days of their FX processors, the more robust AMD architecture allowed their processors to achieve higher base clock speeds. Today the situation is a bit different as the two are more or less equal in this respect.

However, the clock speeds displayed on paper are a very bad way to estimate the performance of any CPU. In fact, they can be confusing, especially in this day and age where you won’t find a gaming CPU with a base clock speed lower than 3 GHz.

The real question is – how are they doing when it comes to overclocking?


amd ryzen

As already mentioned, AMD processors were known for their overclocking abilities. Indeed, all Ryzen CPUs are unlocked and can be overclocked, provided the motherboard chipset actually supports overclocking.

In contrast, not all Intel processors are unlocked. Only models marked with a “K” at the end of the model number are safe to overclock. We emphasize the word “safe” because while there are ways to overclock Intel CPUs that are not unlocked, this is generally not recommended due to the risk of damaging the hardware.

Needless to say, overclocking performance will inevitably vary by model, although Intel processors actually have an edge in this department right now.

Namely, Intel’s high-end processors can be pushed further than their Ryzen counterparts, leading to better single-core performance. While this isn’t a big deal with most builds, enthusiasts looking to squeeze the most performance out of their CPU will want to keep it in mind.

Core Count

Ryzen vs Intel 2020

As mentioned earlier, the high number of cores in the AMD FX processors has helped them stay up-to-date even after the Piledriver architecture has been severely obsolete. At the time of launch, the high number of cores and threads for Ryzen processors was also one of their main selling points, especially as they surpassed almost every model offered by Intel at the time.

So, how do you compare the number of cores and threads in 2022?

Well, first we should tackle the topic of multithreading and hyperthreading quickly.

Basically, these two technologies belong to AMD and Intel, respectively, but are essentially the same – a processor with multithreading / hyperthreading-capable cores that can handle two tasks simultaneously, which greatly enhances their multitasking capabilities.

For example, if a CPU has four physical cores with multi-threading, that means it has a total of eight logical cores, i.e threads.

Now, if we compare the 3rd Gen Ryzen and the 9th Gen Core processors, you can immediately see that all popular Ryzen desktop processors support multithreading, while only the Intel Core i9 models have hyper-threading.

Here’s a quick overview:

  • Ryzen 3 processors have 4 cores and 8 threads, and i3 processors have 4 cores and 4 threads.
  • Ryzen 5 processors have 6 cores and 12 threads, and i5 processors have 6 cores and 6 threads.
  • Ryzen 7 processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, while i7 processors have 8 cores and 8 threads.
  • Finally, Ryzen 9 processors come with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the i9 processors have 8 cores and 16 threads.

In addition to having its chips on both the Xbox One and PlayStation 4, it also supplies the GPU for Nintendo’s Wii U. There may not be much to say about building platforms like tablets or hybrids, but gamers have something to thank for.

Serious CPU Performance for Greater Productivity

If your software can use more cores and threads, and your working day can be streamlined, enhanced and even more profitable with a faster processor, then there are some absolutely monstrous processors to consider.

And that’s mainly AMD.


Intel’s best multi-tasking chipsets for high performance start with the mainstream Core i9 9900K and 10900K processors. They offer eight and ten cores and 16 and 20 threads respectively, with clock rates that easily exceed 5.0 GHz – especially in the latter. Overclocking can take them further, making them the absolute best option for tasks that require individual cores to run as fast as possible.

However, if you need more cores than higher clocks. Intel’s options aren’t that profitable. The 10920X, 10940X and 10980XE processors each offer 12, 14, and 18 cores, with a boost clock of up to 4.6 GHz. However, they are based on a much older architecture than the newer Comet Lake designs and are just not as cost effective as what AMD has to offer.


£ 400 and up is where AMD really outperforms Intel in the productivity sector. The Ryzen 9 3900X provides 12 cores and 24 threads to play with, and for a few hundred pounds more you can increase that to 16 cores and 32 threads with the Ryzen 3950X. Both keep clock speeds above 4.5GHz while increasing the frequency, and can keep them for long periods when effectively cooled.

If you are doing intensive video editing, CAD work, or video transcoding, even 16 cores will not be enough in some cases. This is where advanced AMD Threadripper 3000 processors can make a real difference. They are available in 24, 32 and even 64-core versions and support up to 128 threads thanks to simultaneous multithreading.

They’re more expensive, with the 64-core 3990X priced at around £ 3,750, but to get anywhere near their performance just two years ago you would have had to spend tens of thousands. Unlike previous generations of Threadripper chips, these retain high clock speeds and high single-threaded performance, so you won’t find tasks that don’t support a full stack of cores that might be hampered by choosing a Threadripper over alternatives.

Photo of AMD Threadripper 1950X in socket TR4.

image source: user: geni permission: CC-BY-SA 4.0

Gaming CPUs

Best Bang for Buck

When it comes to Intel or AMD processors for gaming, there is more choice today than it has been in a long time. Both team blue and team red offer fantastic gaming performance from entry level to advanced level. While some processors offer better performance and, most importantly, a better value for that power, you can’t go wrong picking both camps when it comes to getting the most out of your new favorite game.


That said, if you want to get the most out of your money, the processor that offers the best raw gaming performance at a great price is the Intel Core i5-10600K. With six cores, 12 threads, and a standard clock speed that can reach 4.8GHz (for all 4.5GHz cores), it offers the gaming performance that only top AMD processors can come close to, even at higher prices.

What makes the 10600K so special is its overclocking potential. With some tweaks to memory and core clock speed, this CPU could come close to the top-of-the-line Intel Core i9-10900K processor, which costs hundreds of pounds more. While this chip can in turn be overclocked for even greater performance, significant savings can be made by opting for 10600K and overclocking it.

Chillblast can even do it for you. Our expert in-house system builders have decades of experience extracting the highest possible performance from high-end PC hardware and can do it for you absolutely free as part of your PC build contract. It also does not void the five-year warranty.


If you’re geared towards an AMD CPU, you’d have to spend a lot more to get comparable performance to 10600K, which doesn’t offer much. This doesn’t mean you have to expect poor performance, just slightly lower expectations for raw gaming abilities.

The best value for money current generation AMD processors is the Ryzen 5 3600. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, similar to the 10600K, and while it only speeds up to 4.2 GHz, it’s £ 100 cheaper than the 10600K. This leaves an extra budget for a better graphics card; probably the more important issue in games – especially beyond 1080p.

Like the 10600K, the 3600 can also be overclocked. It has robust, automated overclocking algorithms from AMD while using the latest UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) updates and Windows updates, and can be manually boosted to almost 3600X for a CPU power that’s 25% more expensive, for free.

If you want a bit more gaming performance with better future-proofing, the Ryzen 3700X only costs £ 300 and offers great gaming performance with eight cores and 16 threads, boosting to 4.4GHz under the right conditions. As mentioned in the productivity section, this processor is an absolute monster for general computing as well, so if you work and play on the same system, the 3700X is a fantastic choice – easily decimating Intel’s competition in mixed roles.

Image of blue boxes with 10th generation Intel processors stacked together over a white background

image Source: Intel

The third generation of Ryzen processors is based on the Zen 2 architecture. It is manufactured using a 7nm process and consists of many versatile solutions in all price ranges.

AMD vs Intel — How it will go from here and which one you should buy

Fully assembled Intel computer with more systems in the background

AMD versus Intel is a battle that is not coming to an end. As we’ve seen in the past, AMD has a flip-flopping pattern where it gets lost for several years after a streak of industry success. Intel, on the other hand, has practically always held its position and has only recently shown weaknesses that have caught up with AMD’s current market growth.

Intel has had problems with manufacturing processes for several years and it seems that these problems are not over yet. There was a bug in the 10nm process on the Gen 11 chipsets which Intel finally managed to achieve. 12th generation chips go back to the 10nm process. This limits Intel to anywhere between 10nm and 14nm, while AMD will continue to use the most efficient process it can find.

AMD’s acquisition of Xilinx will also give it the ability to go beyond the usual consumer processor offering. While it will take a long time for him to reach Intel’s size, it does not seem like the colossal impossibility it was a few years ago.

Regarding your current purchasing decisions, if you can get it – go for an AMD chip. In all its offerings, AMD offers excellent value for money. Intel’s latest 12th-gen enhancements are quite interesting and seem to offer solid performance, but it will be a while before we are sure that they are a better deal than what AMD has to offer at the moment. Intel is now the choice for those on a budget that AMD is unable to deliver well, or for those who need to pick a CPU without hunting for stocks.

Are you looking for more explanations? Check out these articles further:

In addition to having its chips on both the Xbox One and PlayStation 4, it also supplies the GPU for Nintendo’s Wii U. There may not be much to say about building platforms like tablets or hybrids, but gamers have something to thank for.

Current AMD and Intel processors

At the end of 2018, Intel announced its lineup of 9th generation processors. While still a step up from the 8th Gen Coffee Lake offering, they don’t make a huge improvement by removing hyper-threading from the high-end mid-range and incorporating the 9th Gen i9 as the highest tier consumer desktop processor.

The AMD Ryzen 2 series showed an exceptionally strong presentation earlier this year, and continues to do well against Intel’s best offerings – although AMD undoubtedly beats its head when it comes to single-core performance.

This has been the case in the past, however, and AMD offers a much better value-per-code proposition coupled with the fact that very impressive air coolers are shipped in processor boxes. AMD processors are by no means slow and can handle very demanding tasks with ease – but Intel is undoubtedly better, but it comes at a price.

Realistically speaking, the increased performance that Intel offers on every single core won’t make much difference, but it does.

AMD’s Ryzen 3 is approaching early next year, but the next big battleground will be 10nm or 7nm technology – both AMD and Intel are rushing to produce stable chips on a smaller nano-architecture, and the first to do so will have a huge advantage over others.

AMD vs Intel - Ryzen

Why does Intel vs AMD matter?

If you’re shopping for a traditional laptop or PC, AMD and Intel are your only choices for processors, but don’t make the mistake of thinking that the decline in PC popularity means either company is becoming irrelevant. Of course, Intel doesn’t make all their money from PC and laptop processors.

It also produces graphics processors, wired and wireless network cards, processors and components for servers and workstations, as well as parts for set-top boxes. You will even find Intel chips in many smartphones: some iPhone X models have an Intel modem.

AMD is somewhat the smaller of the two companies. First, while Intel builds its own chips in a dozen (fab) factories in the US, Ireland, Israel, and China, AMD sold its last factory in 2009. Today, like ARM, VIA, MediaTek and others, AMD designs its own chips, but outsources production. The production of microprocessors is extremely expensive.

History and breakthroughs

Both companies have a history of innovation. When Intel produced the 8080 processor in 1974, it laid the foundations for the x86 processors that have been the basis of desktop computers for nearly 30 years.

He’s also a smart marketer: the Mid-2000s Centrino platform, consisting of a low-power processor, wireless chip and mobile chipset, took the market by storm with its reputation for desktop-grade computing power and long battery life. His transition from x86 to “Pentium” (copyrighting a series of numbers proved impossible) was a similar blow to the PR genius.

Intel’s marketing department’s ability to outweigh the expenses and outsmart the minds of others continues. The success of Intel’s Ultrabook trademark may be dangerously tied to Microsoft’s stumbles in Windows 8, but the company’s understanding that consumers need short, snappy brands rather than clock speed and other jargon has survived.

AMD’s position as the underdog is consistent. Marketing consultant Mercury Research reported that AMD achieved a record 22 percent market share in 2006; now the company is hovering around 17 percent, thanks in part to their dominance in the console market: both the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 have custom AMD “Jaguar 8-core processors” at their hearts.

Perhaps AMD’s greatest recent innovation was the 2006 acquisition of ATI, a graphics processing unit (GPU) manufacturer. A $ 5.6 billion (approximately £ 3 billion) deal saw AMD join Intel to supply integrated graphics chips – that is, graphics processors that run on the same chip as the processor.

The result is less graphical power, but significantly reduced power consumption and thermal output. Forget fire-breathing discrete graphics cards – AMD has realized that the future of silicone lies in reducing power consumption and size as much as increasing processing power. Most people these days don’t want more performance: they want better battery life in portable devices.

What went wrong?

At first glance, both AMD and Intel were well placed to respond to user needs as mobile sales exploded. The desktop market continued to decline, laptop sales soared, and the mobile phone begged to be reinvented.

Intel already had an incredibly strong reputation for its Centrino platform for laptops, and while competitor AMD Turion was in a distant second place, there was a race to win a market that knew mobility was the future of computers.

When allied together, these companies do not seem to have the power to stop them completely. In this regard, it is also important to mention that these two companies hold a very strong position in the lives of so many people due to the amount of epic things they can do, together or separately.

Intel vs. AMD: Mobile laptop processors

Intel stickers

source: Windows Center

The laptop market is dominated by Intel, even to this day. Although AMD did manage to regain some public favor after Ryzen’s launch, it was reluctant to enter the mobile space. AMD finally brought some new Ryzen 3000 processors to the market for notebooks, but these were a disappointment compared to what Intel already had.

Things changed with the launch of newer Ryzen 4000 mobile processors, which were actually good enough to be used in products. The Ryzen 9 4900HS is a beastly 8-core processor with 16 threads and can speed up all the way to 4.3GHz. This monster surpassed Intel’s advanced mobile processors, which should pave the way to several significant parts of the market.

Our own reviews of laptops with AMD processors have also been positive. Intel has yet to come out and the market is still completely dominated by blue stickers across the budget spectrum. Your laptop purchase today will most likely include an Intel Core i3, i5, i7 or i9 processor. Intel has an edge in terms of mobile performance (apart from the Ryzen 9 4900HS), but laptops with AMD processors offer much more value.

So, which is better?

Intel processor

source: Rich Edmonds / Windows Headquarters

It’s hard to make the wrong decision when purchasing a CPU, unless you try to install the CPU on an incompatible motherboard. Regardless of whether you choose AMD or Intel, you will have a capable computer that will be able to perform a huge number of tasks. There are, however, clear differences in price and value.

The AMD collection of processors, especially the Ryzen 3000, offers much more value for your money. Whether you’re installing a Ryzen 3 3100 or a Ryzen 9 3950X, you’ll likely get more cores and threads than Intel’s competing CPU, without sacrificing too much performance on the core.

If you’re already platform-tied and don’t plan on changing motherboards, upgrading to a better processor can yield significant results. You just have to remember that Intel only supports the chipset for two generations, while AMD has much better support on older motherboards for newer processors.

Intel has a slight performance advantage over AMD, but it’s hard to see results like this without a synthetic benchmark. We’ll have to keep monitoring the battlefield as Intel and AMD continue to trade blows with the Ryzen 4000, and Gen 11 Intel is moving to the 10nm process.

The processor market has a bright future ahead of it, and this is better for all of us.

We can earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.

Windows 11 product satisfaction is highest of all Windows, says Microsoft

According to Microsoft, Windows 11 is being rolled out twice as fast as Windows 10. In addition, the offer of upgrades to Windows 11 is entering its final phase of availability, which Microsoft did not expect until mid-2022.

Intel’s €1.06 billion antitrust fine overturned by EU’s General Court

The European Union Court has just lifted a € 1.06 billion fine imposed on Intel in 2009. The fine was initially imposed after the European Commission found that Intel was abusing its dominant position in the processor market to foreclose competitors.

Windows 11 is getting Android app preview and new Taskbar features in Feb

Microsoft announced today that it plans to start rolling out several new updates and experiences for Windows 11 customers next month, including taskbar improvements, a new Notepad experience and media player, and even a public preview of Android app support on the system Windows 11.

Rate article