Best AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Graphics Cards To Buy In 2022. Where to buy vega 64

ROG Strix graphics cards feature two HDMI ports for simultaneous VR device and display connectivity, so you can enjoy immersive VR experiences at any time, without changing cables.

Best AMD Graphic Card

The best AMD graphics card

ASUS ROG Strix RX VEGA 64-08G Gaming features Aura Sync lighting system and improved cooling. We reward it with our Editor’s Choice

The ASUS Radeon RX VEGA 64 STRIX OC is an almost full copy of the Radeon RX VEGA 56 STRIX OC. Its specs are just as good

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX Vega 64 Gaming OC Edition is one of the first Vega 64 graphics cards to feature a non-reference PCB and cooler design. It provided excellent performance in our tests, both at the default clock frequencies and after overclocking

Best AMD Graphics Card

The best AMD graphics card

ASUS wins in both the AMD and NVIDIA graphics card categories.

A card that offers many advantages for the best partners on the motherboard, such as fans that do not spin when idle, amazing RGB action, cool looks and tons of ASUS Focus features, quality features and all the extras.

ROG STRIX RX VEGA 64 OC Edition is a first-class modification of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. ASUS has equipped its idea with an original PCB with a 13-phase power subsystem using only high-quality components

AMD RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 never really set the world of PC gaming on fire. As good as they are, compared to what NVIDIA had to offer in its range, they have always been a bit of a shadow. Vega will soon be replaced by Navi, AMD’s new 7nm architecture, and Vega cards will be released to the pastures.

Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX Vega 64

• The best solution for line cooling
• Offers spectacular RGB lighting
• The back plate provides vents for better airflow

Boost core clock: 1580 MHz | GPU cores: 4096 | Memory: 8 GB HBM2 | Memory speed: 945 MHz | Memory Bandwidth: 483.8 GB / s | Length: 12.2 inches | Number of fans: 3 | RGB lighting: Yes | Graphic outputs: 2 x HDMI, 2 x DisplayPort | Power Connectors: 3 x 8 Pin | Maximum nominal power consumption: 375W

Very famous is the Dual-X Nitro + version of Sapphire graphics cards, which was used in the RX 400 and 500 series. This three-fan design is much more unique and a slightly inferior version was used on the R9 Fury models. That beast on the graphics card, the Sapphire Radeon Nitro + RX Vega 64, is one of the most powerful variants of the Vega 64 models, and when it comes to cooling, it’s the most powerful cooler we’ve ever seen on a graphics card, both in terms of quality and dimensions.

The graphics card has a black bezel on the front, while the sides of the bezel and top (Sapphire logo) of the graphics card have RGB lighting and can be controlled via the Sapphire software. This RGB lighting is much better than the dual versions of the Nitro + where only the logo was illuminated on the top. There are three fans on the front (2 x 92 mm, 1 x 80 mm), with the small one in the middle. The graphics card has a beautiful backplate that also offers an RGB backlit area and provides multiple vents for better airflow.

The graphics card provides a 14-phase VRM design that shows extreme stability and helps a lot with overclocking. Speaking of overclocking, the graphics card already has a much higher clock speed than the reference version, which is why we only saw clocks up to 1650 MHz on the core, while the HBM2 memory could not be overclocked as it causes instability.

The graphics card cooling solution offers 3 x 8mm and 5 x 6mm heat pipes that are embedded in the vertically aligned fins of the heatsink. In terms of temperatures, the graphics card reached 70 degrees at full load, which is an excellent temperature as this card has a huge energy requirement.

This graphics card seemed perfect to us in every way, whether you’re talking about aesthetics or performance, however, since this graphics card is exceptionally large, you should make sure it’s compatible with your case.

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX Vega 64

• ROG Strix is ​​designed for a perfect shape
• The patented wing fans ensure very quiet operation
• HDMI ports supporting VR

• Similar to the Nitro + edition in terms of length compatibility
• There is no thermal pad between the PCB and the backplate

Boost core clock: 1590 MHz | GPU cores: 4096 | Memory: 8 GB HBM2 | Memory speed: 945 MHz | Memory Bandwidth: 483.8 GB / s | Length: 11.73 inches | Number of fans: 3 | RGB lighting: Yes | Graphic outputs: 1 x DVI, 2 x HDMI, 2 x DisplayPort | Power Connectors: 2 x 8 Pin | Maximum nominal power consumption: 295 W

ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX Vega 64 is another premium variant of Vega 64, and ASUS has not let us down in any way. Starting with the physical aspects of the graphics card, it offers a complex fan grille in black with six areas for diffused lighting. The graphics card uses three fans which are optimized for quiet operation and are much better than standard fans also in terms of airflow.

The graphics card has a 12 + 1 VRM chip, which is enough for adequate overclocking, and we noticed that the core clocks were hitting 1640 MHz, although the temperature levels on the VRM were getting closer to 90 degrees, which is slightly higher in the range.

The cooling solution provides 6 x 6mm heatpipes and the heat sink is quite large too, so we found temperatures around 75 degrees, which is around 5 degrees higher than the Nitro + version. That’s still a reasonable temperature for this graphics card, and you shouldn’t have to worry about thermals. This graphics card is a pretty good alternative to the Nitro + version, and you can consider it if you don’t like the look of the Nitro variant.

The numbers in the two Vega versions, the RX Vega 56 and the RX Vega 64, are due to the number of compute units on board. This translates to 4,096 stream processors in the RX Vega 64 and 3584 in the RX Vega 56. The more expensive RX Vega 64 also has a slightly higher clock speed.

MILITARY CLASS 4 COMPONENTS

One of the decisive factors in performance is the quality of the components used. Therefore, MSI only uses MIL-STD-810G certified components for graphics cards. These components have proven to be durable enough to withstand torture in extreme gaming and overclocking during extended use.

SOLID CAP

Thanks to the aluminum core construction, Solid CAP is the foundation in high-end component design and provides lower Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR) as well as a service life of over 10 years.

The Future of Gaming

The smoothest, fastest and most thrilling gameplay experience thanks to the elimination of screen tearing, iris, and input lag.

Ultra High Definition (UHD) provides four times the resolution of 1080p, delivering much sharper and clearer images with fine detail when gaming.

The graphics card has a 12 + 1 VRM chip, which is enough for adequate overclocking, and we noticed that the core clocks were hitting 1640 MHz, although the temperature levels on the VRM were getting closer to 90 degrees, which is slightly higher in the range.

Battlefield 1

Now the shoe is on the other foot. Battlefield 1 is a much nicer game to AMD hardware, with the Vega 64 ahead of the GTX 1080 by six percent, four percent over the RTX 2060, and only three percent behind the RTX 2070 at 1080p. At 4K resolution, the Vega 64 is the fastest card of the five we’ve included, and even averages over 60fps – impressive stuff. Unfortunately, this performance is not repeated in many other titles.

• Wega 56
• Wega 64
• GTX 1080
• RTX 2060
• RTX 2070
• Wega 56
• Wega 64
• GTX 1080
• RTX 2060
• RTX 2070
• Wega 56
• Wega 64
• GTX 1080
• RTX 2060
• RTX 2070

This content is hosted on an external platform that will only display it if you accept cookies for targeting. Please enable cookies to view. Manage cookie settings

Crysis 3

The explosive train ride that appears at the start of Crysis 3 creates a beautiful fireworks display and a challenging benchmark, even for graphics cards released five years after the game’s release in 2013. The Vega 64 is six percent ahead of its little brother, the Vega 64, and roughly on par with the RTX 2060 at 1080p. However, the GTX 1080 and RTX 2070’s advantage in sheer power puts them almost 15 percent ahead of the better Vega card at the same resolution. These results are more or less consistent across the different resolutions.

• Wega 56
• Wega 64
• GTX 1080
• RTX 2060
• RTX 2070
• Wega 56
• Wega 64
• GTX 1080
• RTX 2060
• RTX 2070
• Wega 56
• Wega 64
• GTX 1080
• RTX 2060
• RTX 2070

This content is hosted on an external platform that will only display it if you accept cookies for targeting. Please enable cookies to view. Manage cookie settings

This content is hosted on an external platform that will only display it if you accept cookies for targeting. Please enable cookies to view. Manage cookie settings

But are they actually worth it

Buying something because it’s cheap doesn’t mean it’s a profitable purchase. But when it offers good performance and a low price, it suddenly becomes a good value. Basically, that’s what we’re at right now with Vega graphics cards. Either way, you’ll get a solid frame rate and high detail in 1080p and 1440p, albeit from a more power-hungry card than the NVIDIA counterparts. Power consumption is probably the biggest reason you can’t get it.

I just grabbed the reference £ 299 Vega 64 card here in the UK, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors with a higher TDP than the NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti – without offering 1080 Ti performance levels. Unless you have a power supply of at least 650W, more like 750W for the Vega 64, then the value suddenly disappears.

But assuming this is a simple replacement for your system, it remains an excellent choice. The Vega 56 and Vega 64 have never been really bad GPUs, but a number of factors have made them harder to recommend to anyone other than dedicated AMD fans. Prices peaked during the cryptocurrency mining phase of 2018, and even now some variants at different retailers are so high that they never sell to anyone who is able to do a simple internet search.

Pure performance is there. Ignoring what can be obtained from a comparable NVIDIA graphics card, Vega cards deliver high performance. Games can look beautiful and run at high FPS, and now for really good prices if you can get the ones that sell cheap. All this before you consider lowering the voltage or overclocking to unlock some extra performance.

Ultimately, this is the conclusion. For mid-tier money, you can get AMD’s previous high-end graphics cards, and they’re definitely worth it if you can get one at a low price.

Bargain graphics card

Powercolor Red Dragon Vega 56

Suddenly, it is of great value

With Navi on the horizon and some price cuts, the Vega 56 is now a truly powerful mid-range graphics card for anyone looking for performance on a tighter budget.

Cheap PC accessories we love

Take a look at these amazing PC accessories that will enhance your Windows experience.

Anker 4 port USB 3.0 hub ($10 at Amazon)

Whether you’re using a desktop or laptop, you always need more ports to plug things in. This hub provides an additional four USB 3.0 Type A ports.

Ikea Fixa Cable Management System ($11 at Amazon)

This IKEA cable management kit is your ticket to clean installation. It is simple and functional.

NZXT Puck ($20 at Amazon)

This clever little accessory has powerful magnets on the back that allow it to stick to any metal panel on your computer case or anything else. It’s great for hanging accessories like headsets.

The Vega 64’s price cuts are slightly smaller in the US, but in the UK you can now get a reference design from Powercolor for just £ 320. Less than the current price for the RTX 2060, but beats it for the most part in overall performance (again, put ray tracing aside).

New cards, familiar designs

Anyone opting for the reference AMD Radeon RX 480 or 580 edition will find the design of the Radeon RX Vega familiar, which is a bit disappointing. The black plastic case is covered in an attractive dot mesh, which is at least more interesting than the blank reference design, but doesn’t look as nice as Nvidia’s reference cards. This time, however, it has a full backplate which is great.

Bill Roberson / digital trends

While we haven’t had a chance to check it out in person, there is also a limited version of the air-cooled Radeon RX Vega 64 with a silver brushed aluminum cover. The updated look is sleeker and more attractive than the reused black dimpled pattern on the base cards. However, it’s more expensive and costs $ 599, and we doubt it offers functional benefits.

Both Vega reference cards we reviewed were the same size, measuring 10 and a half inches long, about four inches wide, and one and a half inches thick. These dimensions are not unusual for a high-end graphics card and should fit into a typical ATX mid-tower case. Remember, however, that this is a reference project. Most buyers purchase their card from a third party such as Asus, MSI, or Zotac. Each one adds their own style that can increase or decrease the weight.

The Radeon RX Vega 64 ranks among the high-end options of the green team.

Our test units required two eight-pin PCIe power plugs from the power supply, with a recommended power supply of at least 750 W. That’s because the Radeon RX Vega draws a thirsty 295 watts, more than even the 250-watt demand of the GTX 1080 Ti. We expect most OEM cards will require the same, but may pull even more as the liquid-cooled Radeon RX Vega 64 draws a full 345 watts. Energy efficiency has never been AMD’s strongest point and this is the case with Vega.

While the video outputs will vary by OEM, our reference test version ships with a standard set of three DisplayPort and one HDMI port. This is a very common configuration among mid-tier GPUs and allows daisy-chaining up to six displays at once.

And on to the benchmarks

We tested every Radeon RX Vega in our standard graphics card test suite. It’s powered by an Intel Core i7-6950X processor with 16GB of RAM, which should be enough to keep the CPU from ever being a bottleneck for any graphics card. We have used this equipment for a year and all the cards discussed in this review have been compared with it.

Our tests began with the latest 3DMark test, Time Spy. It uses current techniques to push graphics cards off the top shelf and provides a good foundation for performance. So here comes the moment of truth. How are the RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 models doing?

This first test puts the RX Vega 64 just above the Nvidia GTX 1080, while the RX Vega 56 lags about 10 percent.

These results are competitive. The RX Vega 64 costs $ 500, as does the GTX 1080. The small win suggests the AMD card is generally faster, but here the win is so small that it underestimates a bit. The RX Vega 64 is new while the GTX 1080 has been around for a while. The AMD RX Vega 56, which is cheaper at $ 400, is slightly inferior to the GTX 1080 as well.

If you own a FreeSync monitor, ASUS ROG Strix RX Vega 64 should be the card for you. This is one of the best Radeon graphics cards on the market, perfect for #TeamRed. Read more: https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/8383/asus-rog-strix-vega-64-review-refined-kinda/index11.html

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Launch Prices (Credits: Videocardz):

GPU name	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 reference card	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited	AMD Radeon RX Vega fluid
Official Suggested Retail Price	$ 499	$ 599	699 USD
ShopBlt (USA)	$ 650	$ 650	$ 758
LambdaTek (UK)	£ 703	£ 703	£ 789
Md Computers (India)	71,500 INR	INR 72,725	85 350 INR
PC Themes (Singapore)	999 SGD	999 SGD	pLN 1149
Eurozone	599 EUR	599 EUR	699 EUR
Japan	73,800 YPN	73,800 YPN	85,800 YPN

This means consumers will be looking at much higher prices than what was given them in the official AMD slides. A specific variant affected by price inflation is the reference air-cooled model, which should have been delivered for $ 499, but AMD told its partners to sell the card at the same price as the limited-edition model. This means the Reference SKU will be priced at $ 599, which is $ 100 higher than the suggested price, which would be a major drawback for Vega.

Prices for other models have also risen, but the reference model has seen its biggest jump to date.

The AMD limited edition and reference air-cooled models share the same specifications. The only major changes are the design diagram, even the cooling system is the same on both cards. So, those who were expecting to buy a $ 499 Vega card should be concerned. For now, we hope that the situation will only last for the first few weeks and will stabilize in the coming months. AMD said it has delayed the launch of the Radeon RX Vega to produce enough GPUs to power the gaming market.

Just a few days ago, we reported that the AMD Vega 64 graphics card may be the most powerful product ever made for cryptocurrency mining. With that in mind, we can tell you why the price has suddenly risen. AMD knows that their card provides exceptional results in cryptocurrency mining tasks and already there could be a huge number of users queuing for a Vega 64 graphics card. If the card is actually as good at mining as it is supposed to be, we can expect it to be sell well, but this puts the gaming community that was waiting for Vega 64 in a very difficult place.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and Vega 56 Graphics Card Lineup:

Graphics Card	AMD Radeon R9 Fury X	AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 reference card	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 reference card	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 smooth
GPU	Fiji XT	Vega 10	Vega 10	Vega 10	Vega 10	Vega 10
Process node	28nm	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET	14nm FinFET
Compute Units	64	TBD	56	64	64	64
Stream processors	4096	TBD	3584	4096	4096	4096
Raster operators	64	64	64	64	64	64
Texture mapping units	256	TBD	224	256	256	256
Clock Speed ​​(Base)	1000 MHz	TBD	1156 MHz	1247 MHz	1247 MHz	1406 MHz
Clock speed (max)	1050 MHz	TBD	1471 MHz	1546 MHz	1546 MHz	1677 MHz
FP32 calculations	8.6 TFLOPS	TBD	10.5 TFLOPS	12.6 TFLOPS	12.6 TFLOPS	13.7 TFLOPS
FP16 calculations	8.6 TFLOPS	TBD	21.0 TFLOPS	25.2 TFLOP	25.2 TFLOP	27.4 TFLOPS
Memory (VRAM)	4 GB HBM1	8 GB HBM2	8 GB HBM2	8 GB HBM2	8 GB HBM2	8 GB HBM2
Memory bus	4096 bits	2048 bits	2048 bits	2048 bits	2048 bits	2048 bits
Band	512 GB / s	TBD	410 GB / s	484 GB / s	484 GB / s	484 GB / s
TDP	275W	150W	210W	295W	295W	350W
Price	649	TBD	$ 399 ($ 499 in fact)	$ 499 ($ 599 in fact)	$ 599	699
Start	2015	2018	2017	2017	2017	2017

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 will be the latest flagship RTG card (Radeon Technologies Group) after more than two years. Typically, these prices are inflated when cards are available to pre-order before launch, but there are many reports that the prices will remain the same even after release.

The gaming community was eagerly awaiting a new generation of high-performance graphics cards from the company, and when they finally got it, the pricing and mining frenzy increased their difficulty. AIB is also expected to release their custom Radeon variants RX Vega 64 and Radeon RX Vega 56 graphics cards from September.