Is The GTX 1650 Graphics Card Worth It. How good is a 1650 ti

Our latest synthetic benchmark is the 2017 Unigine release, Superposition. This benchmark does cover ray tracing, but it is performed in software, not hardware, and therefore does not use RT cores or other aspects of the GPU.

Is The GTX 1650 Graphics Card Worth It?

Is the NVIDIA GTX 1650 graphics card worth it or is it better with something else? See the simplest answer to this question here.

Is the GTX 1650 worth it

The GTX 1650 is a decent budget GPU. However, we strongly recommend that you buy the RX 570 instead – it offers better performance in the same price range.

If the high-end RTX 20 series cards are too expensive for you, and even the cheaper GTX 1660 and GTX 1660 Ti are out of your budget, you’ve probably been waiting for a really affordable Nvidia card.

The GTX 1650 was introduced as Turing’s most affordable card, and people were understandably excited.

However, before you make a purchasing decision, make sure that it offers the best value for money. Well, you’ve come to the right place.

Read all about the GTX 1650 here: How does it work? Is it good? More importantly, is it worth your hard-earned cash?

Contents Show


GTX 1650

As you can see from the most critical specs mentioned above, the GTX 1650 doesn’t look spectacular. In any case, you shouldn’t expect a $ 150 GPU to surprise you with its paper specs. So how does it work in practice?

Well, the GTX 1650 offers a significant performance boost over the previous generation GTX 1050 and 1050 Ti, so it’s a definite step up from the budget Pascal GPUs of the past.

Basically, it’s a reliable 1080p card. It can be squeezed for extra performance with a suitable cooler and has a very low power consumption.

However, it’s disappointing with the memory department as it only has 4GB of GDDR5 RAM. Unfortunately, that’s not enough with 2022 video game graphics, and it certainly won’t be able to handle resolutions higher than 1080p in more demanding games.

The price of the GTX 1650

That said, the GTX 1650 is a decent budget card in its own right, but doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Considering its current price and competition, we simply can’t recommend it to anyone as a first choice, which brings us to our next point.

If my 1650 laptop had the same 1024 CUDA cores as the 1650 Ti, the difference would be even smaller. On the other hand, if my 1650 was the older GDDR5 model, the difference would be a bit bigger.

1650 Ti vs. 1660: Specs comparison and basic performance lowdown

Both the 1650 Ti and the 1660 share the same core clock speed, length, memory clock speed, memory type (GDDR5), and interface. Here are the main differences:

  • The GTX 1660 has 1408 CUDA cores compared to 1024 in the 1650 Ti.
  • the 1660 is also better at boost clocking (1785 MHz vs. 1725 MHz).
  • the 1660 also has 1,900 million more transistors.
  • The 1650 Ti has a TDP of 75 W compared to the 120 W of the 1660.
  • the 1660 has the width of a 192-bit memory bus compared to the 128-bit 1650 Ti.

In terms of performance and standard benchmarks, the GTX 1660 performs 20-40% better than the 1650 Ti. Similar results also exist for differences in popular FPS games.

Comparison with other GPUs

It is difficult to say in absolute terms which one is better. However, it’s easy to get an idea by comparing both cards with a few other popular ones.

The GTX 1660 is a mid-range graphics card for decent gaming. It exceeds the several years old GTX 1060 6 GB. Nvidia has suggested that the expected 1660 performance is somewhere between the 10 and 20 series.

The GTX 1650 Ti surpasses the Nvidia 1050 in terms of performance. It has a TU117 based CPU, just a weak version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The AMD RX 570 8GB outperforms the GTX 1650 (it also has twice the memory and may be cheaper).

Moreover, its GDDR5 memory uses a 256-bit interface as opposed to the 128-bit used by the GTX 1650. Most importantly, it costs about as much as the GTX 1650, and many models are now easily grabbed at a discount.

Laptops used for testing

The two laptops I’m testing here are the Acer Nitro 5 with the GTX 1650 and the Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 with the 1650 Ti. These are the exact graphics specs for both of the laptops I’m testing, so keep in mind that my 1650 doesn’t have up to the 1024 CUDA cores that Nvidia specifies. Plus, both of mine have the same 50 watt power limit and both of my laptops use GDDR6 memory as well.

It would be ideal to use the exact same laptop with GPU swap, but unfortunately I was not able to do so. Both of these laptops still have the same 6-core Ryzen 5 4600H and 16GB of DDR4-3200 memory in dual-channel mode, and considering I’m going to be focusing on the higher settings in games that are typically more GPU-related, we should it’s still waiting for a fairly honest comparison so that apart from that, let’s move on to some of the results.

20 games tested

Red Dead Redemption 2 was tested using the game benchmark. The 1650 Ti was less than three FPS higher than it was without the Ti, so there’s not much of a difference, but it’s still one of the biggest performance differences among the games in question, with Ti almost 8% ahead. The control was essentially the same on both. Technically, the other than the Ti 1650 was the front end, but that’s less than half a frame, which is definitely within the margin of error. The Apex Legends had less than 4fps ahead on 1650 Ti at all settings to the maximum, which was an above-average difference, making the Ti in this game about 5% faster. Battlefield 5 saw the biggest difference of all 20 games, with Ti 16% above the average FPS on ultra settings. CS: GO is usually more CPU dependent than GPU dependent.

The Nvidia GTX 1650 Ti was on average less than 5% faster than the GTX 1650 out of the 20 games I tested. As you can see, the results can vary greatly from game to game. Some outliers include Fortnite and Control, which were slightly ahead of 1650 non Ti, but the difference in Fortnite was 2 FPS and the control was less than 1 FPS, so it’s still about equivalent performance. Battlefield V was a bit outlier, however, scoring a 16% higher score over the 1650 Ti.

Honestly, I’m surprised the difference was even that big considering both had the same power cap and the GPU specs are the same.

If my 1650 laptop had the same 1024 CUDA cores as the 1650 Ti, the difference would be even smaller. On the other hand, if my 1650 was the older GDDR5 model, the difference would be a bit bigger.

I also tested FireStrike and TimeSpy with 3DMark and the 1650 Ti only had a 6% advantage in Timespy’s graphics scores and less than 5% in firestrike graphics scores, so it’s similar to some games and doesn’t make much difference. I also tested SPECviewperf which tests various professional 3D loads. In most cases, the 1650 Ti was ahead, but the margins could vary considerably depending on the specific test.

More of the same here. The GeForce GTX 1650 has once again been beaten by the Radeon RX 570 and barely exceeds the limit compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

Nvidia GTX 1650 vs 1050 Ti: Conclusion

All in all, the GTX 1650 offers a pretty decent performance boost over the outgoing GTX 1050 Ti, which considering they currently cost exactly the same amount of money makes the GTX 1050 Ti almost obsolete as an entry-level graphics card. As I mentioned above, the main problem is that the AMD Radeon RX 570 also currently costs around £ 150 / $ 150, which is even faster than the GTX 1650.

Rate article