Vega 56 where to buy. Vega 56 where to buy

Subscribe and access members only articles, ad-free reading, free gifts and game discounts. Your support helps us create more great content about PC games.

AMD unveils Vega 64 and 56 starting at $400, available on August 14

Ever since AMD took the world of budget GPUs by storm with the RX 480, users have wondered when the red team will make a move in the high-end graphics card market. As gamers drool over a card based on the new Vega architecture, AMD is ready to roll out the Radeon Vega 56 and 64. It also plans to hit the workstation market with two new Radeon Pro WX cards, one of which has two terabytes of memory.

We learned a lot about the Vega architecture at CES 2017, and our post from this event features many new additions and improvements. With that said, let’s take a look at what’s new.

Vega finally arrives for gamers

Radeon Vega 64, as the name suggests, is powered by a set of 64 next-generation compute units, including 4,096 stream processors. It has a base clock of 1247 MHz and a boost clock of 1546 MHz, which gives a maximum performance of 12.66 teraflops, which is more than twice the performance of the RX 580. Combined with 8 GB of High Bandwidth Memory 2 (HBM2) and a bandwidth of 484 GB / s, the Radeon Vega The 64 represents a huge leap in potential performance, but costs a surprisingly sensible $ 500. This applies to the air-cooled variant.

If that’s still a bit too rich for your bloodstream, the Radeon Vega 56 might be a better option. It reduces the number of next-generation computing units to just 56, which also cuts the price by $ 100 at a very competitive $ 400 price tag. Even so, it still offers up to 10.5 TFlops of potential performance.

Positioning or new AMD Vega hardware gives some credibility to rumors that Vega cards will not beat Nvidia’s GTX 1080 Ti performance. This card costs around $ 700, so if Vega had beaten the GTX 1080 Ti, it would have done so at a discount that might be too good to be true.

It looks like the new Vega cards will be targeting the GTX 1080 and 1070. While perhaps not as exciting on paper, AMD’s win over these cards would be enormous. The GTX 1070 in particular is a bestseller for Nvidia, and AMD is struggling to find the answer to that.

The Vega 56 fared significantly better in this test, slightly outperforming the GTX 1070 at the two higher test resolutions. It also managed to overtake the Radeon R9 Fury X in all three test resolutions.


MSI Afterburner is the world’s most recognized and widely used graphics card overclocking utility that puts you in complete control of your graphics cards. It also provides an extremely detailed hardware overview and includes additional features such as fan profile customization, benchmarks, and video recording.

Afterburner user interface


Bring your games to life

The Radeon ™ RX Vega graphics card is designed for extreme gamers who want to run their games at the highest resolutions, highest frames per second, maximum settings and want the state-of-the-art features to carry them into the future.

Immersive VR Experiences

Experience the next level of immersion in the world of VR gaming and entertainment with Radeon RX graphics cards based on the revolutionary Polaris architecture.

AMD FreeSync™ Technology

Eliminates choppy gameplay and broken frames with smooth, artifact-free performance at virtually any frame rate.

HDR compatible

Increased contrast and colors deliver a strikingly sharp, colorful and vivid visual experience.


One of the decisive factors in performance is the quality of the components used. Therefore, MSI only uses MIL-STD-810G certified components for graphics cards. These components have been proven to be durable enough to withstand torture in extreme gaming and overclocking during extended use.


Thanks to the aluminum core construction, Solid CAP is the foundation in high-end component design and provides lower Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR) as well as a service life of over 10 years.


We’re seeing virtually identical performance on Rainbow Six Siege using the new Vulkan API, although the Vega 56 staggers a bit at 1440p, and again we believe it’s due to the extra 2GB of VRAM.

Performance Summary

Considering how massive the Vega 56 array is and the fact that it has more transistors, many more cores, and has HBM2 memory for over 20% increase in throughput, it’s remarkable what AMD has achieved with the much smaller Navi array. Yes, some of the gains can be attributed to the 7nm process, but a lot of that can be attributed to the RDNA architecture. Before we dive into this conversation, let’s take a look at how the Vega 56 and 5600 XT compare in the 32 titles we tested.

We can see that at 1080p 5600 the XT was 8% faster on average than the Vega 56. The only title where the Vega 56 enjoyed a significant performance advantage was Sniper Elite 4, a title optimized for the GCN architecture, so it makes sense. Vega was also a tad faster in Red Dead Redemption 2, which we think is more of a VRAM problem. We’ve also seen identical performance in Strange Brigade, World War Z, Resident Evil 2, Rainbow Six Siege, Battlefield V, DiRT Rally and Control.

Many other titles favored Navi, including F1 2019, Ghost Recon Breakpoint, The Outer Worlds, Gears 5, The Witcher 3, PUBG, and many more.

Moving on to the 1440p, we’re seeing more of the same, although the 5600 XT’s lead is slightly smaller. At this higher resolution, the newer Navi GPU was 6% faster and overall more consistent.

What We Learned

AMD has made a giant leap with its RDNA architecture and 7nm manufacturing process. The Radeon 5600 XT uses about half the power of the Vega 56 GPU while providing slightly higher performance. These results are in line with AMD’s own claims of a 50% performance boost with RDNA compared to a GCN based GPU at the same power level. They also claim that ~ 20-25% of this increase is provided by the 7nm shrinkage process, with most of it coming from an improvement in per-clock performance.

Given the huge performance improvements and the fact that it’s faster out of the box, we think you fare a lot better with the newer Radeon GPU. Moving on, AMD will be spending more time optimizing gaming performance for RDNA, so expect the gap to widen over time.

The Ryzen CPUs and RX series GPUs introduced a wide range of new software features that we are already huge fans of. Radeon Wattman in particular made overclocking your system’s CPU and GPU a breeze, and you can even adjust a lot of settings like clock frequency and voltage without even restarting your PC.

But are they actually worth it

Buying something because it’s cheap doesn’t mean it’s a profitable purchase. But when it offers good performance and a low price, it suddenly becomes a good value. Basically, that’s what we’re at right now with Vega graphics cards. Either way, you’ll get a solid frame rate and high detail in 1080p and 1440p, albeit from a more power-hungry card than the NVIDIA counterparts. Power consumption is probably the biggest reason you can’t get it.

I just grabbed the reference £ 299 Vega 64 card here in the UK, and it requires two 8-pin power connectors with a higher TDP than the NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti – without offering 1080 Ti performance levels. Unless you have a power supply of at least 650W, more like 750W for the Vega 64, then the value suddenly disappears.

Rate article